Five calculators, each built around one question people genuinely need answered before they commit filament and hours to a job. Each one shows the inputs it used, so you can see which assumption to change when the answer looks wrong.
What each one is for
Print cost. The flagship. Filament, electricity, a failure allowance and machine time, combined into a per-part figure. It asks for your material and printer rather than assuming an average of both, and it asks for your electricity rate rather than quietly using someone else's.
Filament length and weight. Converts between grams, metres and cubic centimetres for a given filament diameter and density. This is the tool behind "how much is left on that spool" and "how many metres are on a 1 kg reel", and the answer differs by material by more than most people expect.
Shrinkage compensation. Tell it the dimension you want on the finished part and which filament you are printing, and it returns the dimension to draw in CAD. It asks which axis you are correcting, because the build plate holds the base while everything above it contracts freely, and a single uniform scale factor gets one of those two wrong.
Print time. An estimate built from layer height, nozzle size, speed and part volume. It will not match your slicer exactly, and the page explains why the two disagree — a slicer's motion model ignores acceleration limits your machine genuinely has.
Material selector. Works backwards from the requirement: operating temperature, outdoor exposure, flexibility, stiffness, and how much difficulty you are willing to accept. It answers with a shortlist rather than a single winner, because most requirements have more than one reasonable answer.
Why they ask so many questions
A calculator that asks for nothing is telling you about an average printer running an average filament in an average country. There is no such printer and no such country, and the resulting number is confidently wrong in a way that is hard to notice.
The calculators here default to real figures — the material's published density, the printer's recorded wattage, a stated electricity rate — and let you replace any of them. Every result names the assumptions behind it. If you disagree with one, change it; if you cannot change it, that is a defect in the tool.
Before you trust any estimate
Weigh a finished print. Compare it with what the estimate said. The ratio between the two is your machine's own correction factor, and it will be more useful to you than any figure on this site, because it silently includes purge, prime lines, supports, and the small extrusion inaccuracies that no model captures. Once you know your factor, every future estimate gets better.